Volume 07 Issue 09 September 2024
Nguyen Thi Nhung
Dai Nam University, Hanoi, Vietnam
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i09-54Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study explores the application and effectiveness of various scaffolding techniques in improving the writing performance of first-year university students. The research focuses on three key questions: (1) how are scaffolding techniques applied in teaching writing? (2) What impact do these techniques have on students' writing performance? (3) Which scaffolding techniques are most effective in enhancing writing skills? A quantitative research design was employed, collecting data from 114 first-year students through pre-test and post-test assessments, as well as a survey among 12 teachers. The results reveal a significant improvement in post-test scores, demonstrating the overall positive impact of scaffolding techniques. Among the techniques evaluated, Utilizing Template emerged as the most effective, showing a statistically significant impact on students’ writing performance. Other techniques, such as Modelling, Guided Practice, Offering Feedback, and Peer Collaboration, did not show significant effects in this study. These findings suggest that structured guidance through templates is particularly valuable in helping students improve their writing skills, while the impact of other techniques may require a longer timeframe to fully materialize. The study highlights the importance of careful scaffolding technique selection and provides insights for improving writing instruction in academic settings.
KEYWORDS:Scaffolding techniques, writing instruction, first year university students, utilizing template, modelling, guided practice, feedback, peer collaboration.
REFERENCES1) Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
2) Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.
3) Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: Techniques for mastering the writing process. Oxford University Press.
4) Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
5) Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York.
6) Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303.
7) Hinkel, E. (2011). Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. 2). Routledge.
8) Hyland, K. (2007). Genre and second language writing. University of Michigan Press.
9) Hyland, K. (2019). Second Language Writing. Cambridge University Press.
10) Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101.
11) Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
12) Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.
13) Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
14) Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
15) Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.
16) Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17) Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180.
18) Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.