Volume 07 Issue 09 September 2024
Asst. Prof.Dr. Alaa Baji Jebur
University of Kufa College of Education for Women English Department
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i09-15Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Ageism has increasingly emerged i n contempora ry American political discourse as a focal point of critique, particularly in the context of prominent political figures such as President Joe Biden. Ageism, or age based discrimination, reflects societal attitu des and biases against individuals based on their age, often manifesting in subtle and overt forms within various social and poli tical settings. The critical pragmatic approach provides a valuable lens through which these manifestations of ageism can be ex amined, particularly in how language and discourse shape and reflect underlying ideologies. Critical pragmatics, as a field of study, emphasizes the examination of language use within its social context, focusing on h ow language practices reveal and perpetuate power dynamics and social inequalities (Verschueren, 1999: 870). This approach scrutinizes how linguistic strategies such as impoliteness, speech acts, and reference function to convey and reinforce ideological positions and fixed stereotypes . I n the political arena, where language is a tool for asserting authority and shaping public perception, understanding these dynamics is crucial for unpacking how ageism operates in political discourse.
KEYWORDS:Ageism, Critical Pragmatics. Political Discourse, Pragmatics, American Political Context
REFERENCES1) Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
2) Bahadur, N. (2017, June 29). Sexist things President Donald Trump has said about women. SELF. https://www.self.com/story/sexist-president-donald-trump-comments
3) Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
4) Bytheway, B. (2005). Ageism and age categorization. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 361-374.
5) Butler, R. N. (1969). Age-ism: Another form of bigotry. The Gerontologist, 9(4), 243-246.
6) Butler, R. N. (2009). Combating ageism. International Psychogeriatrics, 21(2), 211.
7) Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.
8) Culpeper, J. (2005). Impoliteness and the weakest link. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 35-72.
9) Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge University Press.
10) Crystal, D. (2003). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (5th ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
11) Graumann, C., & Wintermantel, M. (1989). Discriminatory speech acts: A functional approach. In D. Bar-Tal, C. Graumann, A. Kruglanski, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions (pp. 183-207). Springer.
12) Guillaumin, C. (1995). Racism, sexism, power and ideology. Routledge.
13) Halliday, M. A. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. Edward Arnold.
14) Hink, E., & Hinck, S. (2002). Politeness strategies in the 1992 vice presidential and presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 38(4), 234-250.
15) Korta, K., & Perry, J. (2011). Critical pragmatics: An inquiry into reference and communication. Cambridge University Press.
16) Laws, G. (1995). Understanding ageism: Lessons from feminism and postmodernism. The Gerontologist, 35(1), 112-118.
17) Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman Group Ltd.
18) Levinson, S. (2007). Deixis. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97-121). Blackwell Publishing.
19) Mey, J. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
20) Nelson, T. D. (2005). Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 207-221.
21) North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth? Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 982-997.
22) Reyes, A. (2011). Racist: Metapragmatic regimentation of racist discourse by Asian-American youth. Discourse & Society, 22(4), 458-473.
23) Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
24) Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
25) Townsend, P. (1981). The structured dependency of the elderly: A creation of social policy in the twentieth century. Ageing & Society, 1, 5-28.
26) Tukhina, Z. M. (2011). Linguistic pragmatic mechanism of humour in political discourse. In G. G. Matveeva & I. A. Zyubina (Eds.), IVth International Conference on Pragmalinguistics and Speech Practices (pp. 97-116). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
27) Verschueren, J. (1999). Whose discipline? Some critical reflections on linguistic pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 869-879.
28) Wales, K. (2011). A dictionary of stylistics (3rd ed.). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
29) Wodak, R. (2009). The semiotics of racism. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 311-353). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
30) Wodak, R., & Benke, G. (2007). Gender as a sociolinguistic variable: New perspectives on variation studies. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), The handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 88-105). Blackwell Publishing.
31) Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.