Volume 07 Issue 08 August 2024
1Rochmad Bayu Utomo, 2Martinus Budiantara, 3Ni Luh Gde Ana Pertiwi, 4Desak Putu Putri Maharani, 5I Gusti Ayu Lia Yasmita
1,2,3,4Prodi Akuntansi Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta, Jalan Wates Km 10, Bantul, Yogyakarta
5Prodi Ekonomi Pembangunan Universitas Tabanan, Jalan Wagimin No 8 Tabanan, Bali
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i08-35Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The development of the tourism sector has a positive impact on the craft industry. Bali Province and the Special Region of Yogyakarta are two regions that are very well-known in the tourism sector that produce many types of crafts, one of which is in the textile sector. Both provinces have very specific economic characteristics when compared to other provinces in Indonesia. The increase in the tourism sector has been proven to have a positive impact on reducing poverty rates, unemployment, and also inequality in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province and in the Province of Bali. Bali Province is famous for its woven fabric craft industry and the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province is famous for its batik cloth craft industry. Both traditional fabrics are currently still sought after by both domestic and foreign tourists, because of the beauty of the motifs that are full of meaning, but the sales figures for both fabrics are still very low. This study aims to (1) determine the effect of business capital on the income of traditional fabric craftsmen. (2) To determine the effect of social capital on the income of traditional fabric craftsmen (3) To determine the effect of innovation as a moderating variable on the relationship between business capital and the income of traditional fabric craftsmen. (4) To determine the effect of innovation as a moderating variable on the relationship between social capital and the income of traditional fabric craftsmen. The population in this study were all batik/woven fabric craftsmen in Tenganan Pengringsingan Tourism Village and Giriloyo Tourism Village. The sample used accidental sampling with questionnaires distributed to 65 respondents. The results of this study social capital and Innovation affect the income of craftsmen, while business capital does not affect the income of craftsmen. Innovation does not moderate the relationship between social capital and business capital on the income of craftsmen. The implication of this study is that craftsmen must create innovations according to local customs, culture and norms so as not to eliminate the meaning of the cloth. The limitation of this study is that the sample is only spread across several points.
KEYWORDS:Social Capital, Business Capital, Innovation, Income
REFERENCES1) Alfiana Denia. (2021). Pengaruh Modal Usaha, Lama Usaha dan Jam Kerja Terhadap Pendapatan Usaha Pada Pelaku Ekonomi Kreatif. Skripsi; Universitas Islam Malang.
2) Aprilia, R. A., Gunarto, T., & Taher, A. R. Y. (2021). Modal Sosial Sebagai Upaya Keberlangsungan Usaha Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Kasus Pada Debitur Ultra Mikro (UMI) PT. Pegadaian (PERSERO) Area Lampung). E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 664. https://doi.org/10.24843/EEB.2021.V10.I08.P02
3) Dalimunthe M Soleh Hariyadi and Rudi Musniadi. (2023). Pendapatan Pengrajin Tenun dan Perbandingannya Dengan Standar Kemiskinan Badan Pusat Statistik dan Bank Dunia. Proceding, Student Coference.
4) Ekatama et al. (2023). Pengaruh Digital Marketing dan Inovasi Produk Terhadap Pendapatan UMKM. Proseding; Seminar Nasional.
5) Elwisam, & Lestari, R. (2019). Penerapan Strategi Pemasaran, Inovasi Produk Kreatif Dan Orientasi Pasar Untuk Meningkatkan Kinerja Pemasaran UMKM. Jurnal Riset Manajemen Dan Bisnis (JRMB) Fakultas Ekonomi UNIAT, 4(2), 277–286. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/235155695.pdf
6) Fadli. (2015). Social Capital And Community Income. Jurnal Agrium 12(1), Maret 2015. Hlm. 35-39
7) Harumy, T. H. F. (2021). Modal Sosial Dalam Peningkatan Produk Umkm Penerbit Cv.Eureka Media Aksara (D. Winarni, Ed.). Eureka Media Aksara.
8) Hills, G. E. (1994). Marketing and entrepreneurship: Research ideas and opportunities. . Praeger.
9) Lawang, R. M. Z. (2004). Kapital Sosial dalam Perspektif Sosiologik suatu Pengantar. FISIP UI PRESS. Jakarta.
10) Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of Microeconomics 9e. Cengage Learning Asia Pte Limited.
11) Putri, Ica Febrianti and Hamid Hidayat. (2011). Analisis Presepsi Modal Sosial dan Hubungan Dengan Eksitensi Kelompk Tani. Wacana, Vol 14 (1).
12) Septia, C., & Sudiana, I. K. (2020). Pengaruh Modal, Teknologi, Harga Dan Produksi Terhadap Pendapatan Pengrajin Kain Endek Di Kota Denpasar. EP Unud, 9(9), 1888–1955.
13) Sugiyono. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta.
14) Utami, K. S. (2022). Penguatan Strategi Pemasaran UMKM di masa Pandemi Covid-19: Studi Kasus Pelaku Usaha Tenun di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Jurnal Maksipreneur: Manajemen, Koperasi, Dan Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 284–302. https://doi.org/10.30588/JMP.V11I2.879