Volume 07 Issue 12 December 2024
1Rekly Arief Sidharta Udhayanto, 2Handriyono, 3Intan Nurul Awwaliyah
1,2,3Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Jember, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i12-35Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the mediating role of discipline in the relationship between motivation, work skills, work culture, and drivers' performance at PT Hiba Logistic (Hilog). Utilizing an explanatory research design, this study explores causal relationships among the variables to test hypotheses and uncover new insights. The independent variables include motivation (X1), work skills (X2), and work culture (X3), with discipline (Z) serving as the mediating variable and performance (Y) as the dependent variable. Structural Equation Modeling with Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) was employed for data analysis using the SmartPLS 4.0 application. The findings reveal the following: (1) motivation significantly influences discipline, (2) work skills do not significantly influence discipline, (3) work culture significantly influences discipline, (4) motivation does not significantly influence performance, (5) work skills do not significantly influence performance, (6) work culture significantly influences performance, (7) discipline significantly influences performance, (8) discipline significantly mediates the relationship between motivation and performance, (9) discipline does not significantly mediate the relationship between work skills and performance, and (10) discipline significantly mediates the relationship between work culture and performance. These findings provide practical insights into the critical role of discipline in driver performance and its implications for enhancing workplace dynamics. e job skills, and performance variables [10]. Discipline has a significant effect on mediating work culture and performance variables
KEYWORDS:motivation, work skills, work culture, discipline, driver performance
REFERENCES1) Achmad, et al (2018). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja dan Kompetensi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai melalui Disiplin Kerja. Jurnal Mirai Management.Tavel, P. (2007). Modeling and Simulation Design. AK Peters Ltd.
2) Adha, e. a. (2019). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Lingkungan Kerja, Budaya Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Penelitian Ipteks, 47-62.
3) Deci, E.L., & R.M. Ryan. 1985. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality. Volume 19, Issue 2.
4) Desi, D. E., & Liantifa, M. (2023). Pengaruh Keterampilan Kerja, Disiplin Kerja dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa (DPMD) Kota Sungai Penuh. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen Teknologi, 260-270.
5) Dolphina, E. (2012). Pengaruh Motivasi, Kepemimpinan Dan Budaya Kerja Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Karyawan Serta Dampaknya Pada Kinerja Perusahaan. SEMANTIK.
6) Elida, M. (2019). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia dan Personalia. Banjarmasin: Antasari Pers.
7) Feri. S et al. (2020). Pengaruh Motivasi, Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Budaya Organisasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Melalui Kepuasan Kerja Sebagai Variabel Intervening Studi Pada PT. Champion Kurnia Djaja Technologies. INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis dan Manajemen Indonesia, 134-151.
8) Firmansyah, D., & Mistar. (2020). Pengaruh Kedisiplinan Terhadap Produktivitas Kerja Pegawai Pada Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Bima. DIMENSI, 202-216.
9) Handoko, T. (2011). Manajemen (Edisi Kedua). Yogyakarta: BPFE Yogyakarta.
10) Hasibuan, J. S., & Silvya, B. (2019). Pengaruh Disiplin Kerja Dan Motivasi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan. Seminar Nasional Inovasi Produk Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat & Tantangan Revolusi Industri 4.0 (hal. 134-147). Banda Aceh: LPPM Universitas Serambi Makkah.
11) Hidayat, et al. (2024). Pengaruh Motivasi Kerja, Disiplin Kerja dan Gaya Kepemimpinan terhadap Kinerja Karyawan di PT Kalimutu Mitra Perkasa. Journal of Management and Business.
12) Irwansyah. (2024). Pengaruh Job Description Dan Disiplin Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan PT. Nada Swalayan. Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal, pp. 5547–5556.
13) Luthan, F. (2011). Organızatıonal Behavıor: An Evidence-Based Approach. McGraw-Hill.
14) Maringan, e. a. (2016). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan, Sikap Kerja Dan Keterampilan Kerja Terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan Pt. Wahana Sumber Lestari Samarinda. AKUNTABEL, 135-150.
15) Moron, e. a. (2023). Pengaruh Budaya Kerja Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Ikamala. Kompetitif, 1-14.
16) Sedarmayanti, & Rahadian, N. (2018). Hubungan Budaya Kerja Dan Lingkungan Kerja Terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Pegawai Pada Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi , 63-77.
17) Silaen, N. e. (2021). Kinerja Karyawan. Kabupaten Bandung: WIDINA BHAKTI PERSADA BANDUNG.
18) Silva, C. A., & Rosa, F. S. (2022). Control and motivation in task performance of public servants at home office in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista de Gestao, 267-281.
19) Sutrisno, E. (2009). Mamajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Dalam E. Sutrisno, Mamajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Edisi Pertama. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.
20) Syahdan, F. (2017). Hubungan Antara Keterampilan Kerja Dengan Produktivitas Kerja. Psikoborneo, 81-88.
21) Synder, K., Ingeslson, P., & Backstrom, I. (2024). Developing value-based leadership for sustainable quality development: a meta-analysis from a study of Lean manufacturing. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma.
22) Titisari, P., Susanto, A. B., & Permatasari, Y. I. (2021). The Role of Internal Communication, Work Discipline, And Employee Loyalty on Employee Performance. GENERAL MANAGEMENT, 166-170.
23) Tolo, e. A. (2016). Pengaruh Keterampilan Kerja Disiplin Kerja Dan Lingkungan Kerja. EMBA, 256–267.
24) Wardiansyah et al (2024). The effect of employee motivation and employee engagement on job performance mediated by job satisfaction. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 220–231.
