¹Ahmad Hunaeni Zulkarnaen, ²Akbar Sanjaya

^1,2Faculty of Law, Universitas Suryakancana

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i11-59

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The Industrial Relations Court has the authority to resolve Industrial Relations Disputes by the Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Law, namely Law Number 2 of 2004. This study aims to analyze the limitations of the authority of the Industrial Relations Court with the Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 7 of 2012. The type of research used in this paper is normative juridical. The statutory approach and the conceptual approach are used. The analysis uses qualitative description. The results of this study show that the settlement of industrial relations disputes through the Industrial Relations Court can be carried out after settlement through non-litigation methods is unsuccessful. Disputes that can be resolved in the Industrial Relations Court are Industrial Relations Disputes, namely Rights Disputes, Interest Disputes, Termination of Employment Disputes and Disputes Between Trade Unions. The Industrial Relations Court can resolve disputes as long as other dispute cases do not accompany them, such as bankruptcy or criminal cases.

KEYWORDS:

Law, Social, Court, Dispute, Industrial Relations.

REFERENCES
1) Ali, M. (2024). The Settlement Of Industrial Relations Disputes: Legal Actions For Laborers In Defending Their Rights. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 11(1), 89–107.

2) Budiman, A. (2024). Resolution of employment termination disputes in the industrial relations court cocerning works rights specifically in relation. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 4(1), 16–26.

3) Dinata, E., & Sugianto, E. (2024). The Role of Government in Efforts to Resolve Labor Conflicts on Industrial Relations in The Company. International Journal of Economics Development Research, 5(2), 1755–1765.

4) Kusmayanti, H., Yuanitasari, D., Suhartini, E., Masykur, M. H., Kania, D., Rajamanickam, R., & Artiana, M. M. (2023). Acte Van Dading In the settlement of industrial relations disputes in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2274148

5) Nurhayati, S., Rafianti, F., Wakhyuni, E., & Hutabarat, W. L. (2024). Advocacy Model for Combined Process (Med-Arbitration)-Based Resolution of Industrial Relations Conflicts Between Trade Unions and Businesses. Pena Justisia, 23(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i3.2463

6) Pamungkas, Y., & Yurikosari, A. (2023). The Existence Of Industrial Relations Dispute Reso-Lution Institutions At The Close Of The Company (Lock Out). Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service, 4(2), 582–595. http://devotion.greenvest.co.id

7) Pramono, A. (2020). Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes and Termination of Work Relations according to the Applicable Legislation. Walisongo Law Review, 2(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.21580/Walrev/2020.2.2.6671

8) Prayitno, S., Hasan, D., & Subarsyah, T. (2022). Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement at the Industrial Relations Court (PHI) in Indonesia and the Application of Procedural Law. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Www.Ijicc.Net, 16(1), 50–61. www.ijicc.net

9) Ritonga, D., Fitrian, A., & Hendro, G. (2022). Execution Of Decisions Of The Industrial Relations Court With Permanent Legal Force (Inkracht). LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI), 1(3), 35–44. https://ojs.transpublika.com/index.php/POLRI/

10) Samuel, G. (2020). How Industrial Dispute Problems Are Resolved in Indonesia? A Book Review Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial, Ari Hermawan, UII Press, 142 Pages, ISBN 978-602-6215-56-7. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 2(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v2i1.34819

11) Sarira, I. (2016). Mediation On Industrial Relation Dispute And Its Relation With Relative Authority In The Legal Proceedings Process. HUMANIORA, 7(2), 263–272.

12) Sudiarawan, K. A., & Martana, P. A. H. (2022). Examining Independent Procedure Regulation At The Indonesian Industrial Relations Court. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 24(3), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v00i0.23251

13) Sudrajat, S. A., & Witro, D. (2022). Legal Protection in Labor Dispute Settlement Through Industrial Relations Mechanism. Khazanah Hukum, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i1

14) Tamba, T., Juita, S. R., & Astanti, D. I. (2023). Legal Protection in The Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes in Indonesia. JURNAL JUSTICIABELEN, 6(1), 14–23.

15) Widyastuti, T. V., Soponyono, E., Hamzani, A. I., Bawono, B. T., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2024). Industrial Relations Dispute Resolution Model in Indonesia. Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(2), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v3i2.8116

16) Wijayanti, A., Lelisari, Dewi, I. K., Chamdani, & Arifin, S. (2023). Framework for Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes in the Field of Cultural Tourism Based on Local Wisdom in Sumbawa. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Law and Local Wisdom in Tourism (ICBLT 2022), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-93-0_29

17) Zamroni, M. (2018). Disputes Settlement Of Industrial Relations In Indonesia. Jurnal Reformasi Hukum: Cogito Ergo Sum , 1(2), 77–82.

Volume 07 Issue 11 November 2024