November 2024

Volume 07 Issue 11 November 2024
A Comparative Analytical Approach on Amitav Ghosh’s The Shadow Lines in the National Contexts of India and Overseas
Jebun Ara Geeti, PhD,
The University of Sydney
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i11-54

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Amitav Ghosh’s much-acclaimed novel The Shadow Lines generally explores the history of traumatic memories of cultural dislocations, and the Partition between India and Pakistan in 1947. Since it was published in 1988, the text has been widely studied and explored by numerous critics from diverse geographical and cultural backdrops particularly in India, the UK, the US, and Australia. It is amazing that the book has received multifaceted evaluations and assessments across the globe that have rendered a fascinating impact on its critics and readers who have admired the book as both contemporary and classic. It is important to note that “national context” remains a vital and influential criterion in evaluating any scholarly work that has the potential to become a part of world literature. Besides, analysing Ghosh’s reception from India and three major western countries can significantly foreground different or alternative patterns of literary criticism that can refrain a popular author from being misjudged. Often a general analysis of significant works of a transcontinental author can be partial or restricted in an increasingly globalised literary scenario of the world. Thus, this paper aims to examine the influence of prominent national institutions based in India, the U.K., the U.S., and Australia in shaping the critical reception of this contemporary postcolonial author.

KEYWORDS:

Partition, Dislocation, Geographical Boundaries, Identity Crisis, East-West Dilemma

REFERENCES
1) Ashcroft, Bill, 2013. “Border free: Amitav Ghosh as a Child of Midnight”, Children of Midnight: Contemporary Indian novel in English, Delhi: Pencraft International.

2) Bose, Brinda. 2003. “Amitav Ghosh: Critical Perspective”. Pencraft International. The University of Michigan.

3) Black, Shameem, 2006. “Cosmopolitan at Home: Amitav Ghosh’s The Shadow Lines”. Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 41(3): 45-65, doi.10.1177/0021989406068734.

4) Brennan, Timothy. 1988. “India, Nationalism, and Other Failures.” South Atlantic Quarterly, 87(1), 131-46.

5) Butler, Judith, 2003. “After Loss, What Then?”. University of California Press.

6) Chatterjee, Partha. 1989. “Colonialism, Nationalism, and Colonized Woman: The Contest in India.” American Ethnologist, 16(9): 622-633. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/645113.

7) Cusack, Tricia, 2000. “Janus and Gender: Women and the Nation’s Backward Look”, Nations and Nationalism, 6(4): 541-561.

8) Chandra, Vinita, 2003. “Suppressed Memory and Forgetting: History and Nationalism in The Shadow Lines”. Amitav Ghosh: Critical Perspective, Pencraft International, The University of Michigan.

9) Dhawan, R.K. 1998. The Novels of Amitav Ghosh. New Delhi: Prestige Books, 1999.

10) Dixon, Robert, 1996. “Traveling in the West’: The Writing of Amitav Ghosh”, Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 31(1) :3-24.

11) Ghosh, Amitav, 1985. The Circle of Reason, New Delhi: Penguin Books.

12) Ghosh, Amitav, 1988. The Shadow Lines, New Delhi: Penguin Books.

13) Ghosh, Amitav, 1996. The Calcutta Chromosome, New Delhi: Penguin Books.

14) Ghosh, Amitav, 2000. The Glass Palace, London: Harper Collins.

15) Ghosh, Amitav. 2008. Sea of Poppies, New Delhi: Penguin Books.

16) Gill, Stephen, 1991. Landmarks of World Literature: Wordsworth The Prelude. Cambridge University Press.

17) Gilroy, Paul, 2004. After Empire: Taylor & Francis Ltd.

18) Halloran, Thomas F. 2015. “National Allegory and Partition in The Shadow Lines”, Critical Essays, edited by Bibhash Choudhury, 45-55, New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.

19) Hawley, John C. 2005. “A Tale of Two Riots: The Circle of Reason and The Shadow Lines”, a. Contemporary Indian Writers in English, 46-82. New Delhi:Foundation Book.

20) Jameson, Frederic, 1986. “Third World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism”, Social Text, 15: 65-88. Paris: Shakespeare, and Company.

21) Joyce, James,1922, Ulysses. Paris, Shakespeare, and Company.

22) Kapadia, Novy, 2001.Amitav Ghosh’s The Shadow Lines:Asia Book Club

23) Kaul, A, N. 2018. “A Reading of The Shadow Lines’ in Amitav Ghosh, The Shadow Lines: Educational Edition.

24) Kaul, Suvir, 2018. “Separation Anxiety: Growing Up Inter/National in Amitav Ghosh’s a. The Shadow Lines”, Oxford Literary Review, 15(1): 125-145.www.jstor.org/stable/44244503.

25) Malhotra, Meenakshi, 2003. “Gender, Nation, History: Some Observation on Teaching The Shadow Lines, Critical Perspective, Pencraft International: The University of Michigan.

26) Mee, John, 2003. “The Burthen of the Mystery Imagination and Difference in The Shadow Lines”, Critical Companion, edited by Tabish Khair, 90-108, Delhi:Permanent Black.

27) Nabizadeh, Golnar, 2012. “Talismans of the Past: Amitav Ghosh’s The Shadow Lines”,Departure and Arrival: Loss and Mourning in Literary Migrant Narratives, University of Western Australia.

28) Roy, Arundhati, 1997. “The God of Small Things”. India: Penguin Books.

29) Rushdie, Salman, 1981. “Midnight’s Children”. London: Vintage Books.

30) Said, Edward, 2003.Freud and the non-European.”. London: Verso.

31) Sharrad, Paul, 2009. ““The Necessary Germ”: Amitav Ghosh’s Fiction and Writing in the Post-Colonial Space”. Writing in a Post-Colonial Space”, edited by Surya Nath Pandey, 86- 99, New Delhi: Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.

32) Seth, Bikram, 1993. “A Suitable Boy”. US: Harper Collins.

33) Yuval-Davis, Nira, 1997. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Volume 07 Issue 11 November 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar