¹Haffian Abdi.M, ²Pujiyono

¹Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang
²Lecturer Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Semarang

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i11-26

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research discusses the comparison of the criminal law system and the characteristics of the legal family in Indonesia after the enactment of the new kuhp. This research uses a normative juridical approach method, namely by examining / analyzing secondary data in the form of legal materials, especially primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The specification in this research is analytical descriptive research. In studying comparative law there are two benefits, namely Theoretical Benefits Can support the development of legal science in general and criminal law in particular, covering two things, namely, closely related to research in the field of legal philosophy and legal history; closely related to the understanding and development of national law. And Practical benefits Provide positive input for the development and formation of law in general and criminal law in particular. The results of the research show that the criminal law system in Indonesia until now (before the enactment of the New Criminal Code) belongs to the Romano-Germanic Family of law. This can be seen from the identical characteristics between the characteristics possessed by the criminal law system in Indonesia and the characteristics of the Romano-Germanic Legal Family. After the enactment of the New Criminal Code, there is a shift in the legal family, which was originally the Romano-Germanic legal family or civil law has shifted/changed to a mixed legal family or legal mix system or civil law and religious law.

KEYWORDS:

Comparative Criminal Law, Family of Law Characteristics, New Criminal Code

REFERENCES
1) Ali, A. (2012). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori peradilan (Jurisprudence): Termasuk Interpretasi terhadap Undang-undang (Legisprudence).

2) Atmasasmita, R. (2000). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju

3) Burlian, P. (2015). Sistem Hukum di Indonesia (full text).

4) Gerald Paul Mc Allen (2010), An Introduction to American Law. Carolina: Academic Press. p. 63

5) Gozali, D. S. (2020). Pengantar Perbandingan Sistem Hukum.

6) Merryman, J., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2018). The civil law tradition: an introduction to the legal systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford University Press

7) Nawawi, B. (2014). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

8) Peter De Cruz (2014). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law Dan Socialist Law. Bandung: Nusa Media.

9) Qamar, N. (2010). Perbandingan sistem hukum dan peradilan civil law system dan common law system. Makassar: Pustaka Refleksi.

10) Ramadhan, C. (2018). Konvergensi Civil Law dan Common Law di Indonesia dalam Penemuan dan Pembentukan Hukum. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(2), 213-229.

11) Shodiq, D. M., & Djafar Shodiq, S. H. (2023). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum.

12) Irmawanti, N. D., & Arief, B. N. (2021). Urgensi tujuan dan pedoman pemidanaan dalam rangka pembaharuan sistem pemidanaan hukum pidana. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(2), 217-227.

13) Wicaksono, D. (2022). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia dengan Belanda Ditinjau Berdasarkan Karakteristik Romano-Germanic Legal Family. Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 181-196.

14) Widodo, E. (2010). Relevansi Sistem Civil Law Dan Common Law Dalam Pengaturan Hukum Perjanjian Baku Di Indonesia. De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syar'iah, 2(2).

15) Rumah Tahan Negara Kelas IIB Pelaihari (2024). Kenapa “KUHP” Harus Diubah? Diperoleh dari https://rutanpelaihari.kemenkumham.go.id/informasi-publik-2/infographis/kenapa-kuhp-harus-diubah#:~:text=KUHP%20Indonesia%20(Wetboek%20van%20Strafrecht,tahun%201918%20dengan%20beberapa%20penyesuaian. Diakses pada 06 Juni 2024

Volume 07 Issue 11 November 2024