Volume 07 Issue 11 November 2024
1I Nyoman Kardana, 2I Gusti Ngurah Adi Rajistha, 3Agus Darma Yoga Pratama, 4Made Sri Satyawati
1,2,3Universitas Warmadewa, Bali, Indonesia
4Universitas Udayana, Bali, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i11-02Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
A good communication is reflected in the use of good and appropriate language. Politeness in a language is an important thing that needs to be considered in communication. However, often the problem of politeness in language becomes an obstacle for the younger generation in using Balinese. For that reason, a research on politeness in language related to the use of good and appropriate language in using Balinese is very important to do.
Data of this research is written data of Balinese folklore. To obtain good research results, the data collection method applied in this study is the observation method with the help of notes. The data analysis used matching and distributional methods with intralingual and extralingual techniques. The data was analyzed referring to the view that living language (used orally and in writing) represents facts about nature, society and culture that exist in its environment so that in addition to being a social fact, language is also a record of natural facts as a sign of the relationship between humans and their natural environment.
This study shows that the principle of politeness includes the principle of politeness and the principle of cooperation. Related to the two principles, the forms of compliance with the principle of politeness and the principle of cooperation, the forms of violations of the two principles, and the reasons why violations of the two principles of politeness can occur are studied.
politeness, cooperation, pragmatics, principle
REFERENCES1) Ambarwati, R., Nurkamto, J. and Santosa, R. Phatic and Politeness on Women’s Communication in Facebook: Humanistic Teaching Perspective of Being Polite in Social Media. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 4(1); 2019. 1-95p
2) Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 1993. Metode Linguistik: Ancangan Metode Penelitian dan Kajian. Bandung: Eresco. p. 8
3) Dixon, R.M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistics Theory. Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P62-64, 73-74
4) Dil, A.S. (ed). 2001. The Ecology of Language: Essay by Einar Haugen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5) Fill, A. dan P. Muhlhausler (ed). 2001. The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, EcologyandEnvironment. London: Continum.
6) Granoka, Ida Wayan Oka, dkk. 1996. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Bali. Denpasar: Pemda Tingkat I Bali. p. 255-257
7) Grice, H. P. Logic and Conversation: The Philosophy of Language. New York: Oxford University Press.; 1975.
8) Haspelmath, Martin. 2002. Understanding Morphology. Great Britain: Arnold.P.16--17
9) Katamba, Francis. 1993. Morphology. London: MacMillan Press Ltd.p.20
10) Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman
11) Leech, Geofree. Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.; 1993.
12) Quirk, Randolph, et.al. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of The English Language. London: Longman
13) Saeed, John.I. 1997. Semantics. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.h, Geoff
14) Sneddon, James Neil. 1996. Indonesian Reference Grammar. Brisbane: Allen & Unwin
15) Sudaryanto. 1993. Metode dan Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta wacana University Press. p.9,133
16) Sudaryanto. 1986. Metode Linguistik. Ke Arah Memahami Metode Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
17) Van Valin Jr and LaPolla, Randy. 1997. Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.p.3.
18) Winter, B., Duffy, S. E., & Littlemore, J. 2020. Power, Gender, and Individual Differences in Spatial Metaphor: The Role of Perceptual Stereotypes and Language Statistics. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(3), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2020.1794319.
19) Yuliantoro, A. Analisis Pragmatik. Klaten: UNWIDHA; 2020.
