¹I Putu Dharmanu Yudartha, ²I Gusti Bagus Wirya Agung

¹Public Administration Department, Udayana University

²Sosiology Department, Udayana University

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i10-47

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study explores the synergy between Bumdes (Village-Owned Enterprises) and BUMDA (Customary Village-Owned Enterprises) within the framework of dynamic governance in Kutuh Village, Badung District, Bali. Dynamic governance is a contemporary approach that emphasizes adaptability, innovation, and participatory decision-making in managing public resources and institutions. Through qualitative methods, including interviews, observations, and document analysis, the research investigates how these two entities collaborate to enhance local economic development and community welfare. The findings indicate that the synergy between Bumdes and BUMDA has significantly contributed to Kutuh Village's economic resilience and self-sufficiency. Bumdes focuses on leveraging local resources for commercial ventures, while BUMDA preserves and promotes traditional customs and social capital. Together, they create a balanced and sustainable development model that aligns with the principles of dynamic governance. The collaboration has led to successful initiatives in tourism, agriculture, and craft industries, driving increased income and employment opportunities for villagers.

KEYWORDS:

Dynamic Governance, Sinergy, Bumdes, Bumda

REFERENCES
1)Alim, B. N. (2022). Upaya Mewujudkan Dynamic Governance Pada Pelayanan Publik Di Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Dialogue: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 4(2), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v4i2.14645

2) Chen, N. (2023). A dynamic model of rural governance system with the social-ecological framework. 10(2), 114–116.

3) Fauzi, L. M., & Iryana, A. B. (2017). Strategi Dynamic Governance Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Provinsi Jawa Barat. UNIGAL, 53(9), 13–30. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/moderat/article/download/749/653

4) Firdaus, R., Prayugo, & Huda, N. (2020). Pemanfaatan Dana Desa Dalam Pembangunan Desa Dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa Di Desa Ulu Pulau. Jurnal Syariah Dan Ekonomi Islam, 1(1), 69–77.

5) Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.02.003

6) Meutia, I. (2017). Pengelolaan Keuangan Dana Desa. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 8(2), 336–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.18.202/jamal.2017.08.7058

7) Miller, G. J., & Whicker, M. L. (2017). Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration, Second Edition. In Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203908303

8) Oikonomou, G. (2020). Decentralizing Governance. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3918-1

9) Rahmatunnisa, M. (2015). Dialektika Konsep Dynamic Governance. E-JOURNAL FISIP UNJANI, 4, 233–258. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-06508-4

10) Sidik, F. (2015). Menggali Potensi Lokal Mewujudkan Kemandirian Desa. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 19(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.7962

11) Suryawati, N. (2021). Dynamics of Village Governance based on Law Number 6 Year 2014 Concerning Village Communities. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 25(3), 8324–8332

Volume 07 Issue 10 October 2024