October 2024

Volume 07 Issue 10 October 2024
Study of Unlawful Acts in the Implementation of Fiduciary Execution (Verdict Study No.345/pdt.g/218/PN jkt.sel)
1Ahmad Taher Ridwan Alfaribi, 2I Ketut Oka Setiawan
1,2Faculty of Law, Pancasila University, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i10-38

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

As a form of security derived from law, fiduciary security has been used in Indonesia since the Dutch colonial era. Although the procedure is considered quick, easy, and uncomplicated, this type of collateral is often used in lending and borrowing transactions. Still, it does not provide legal certainty for creditors in their capacity as fiduciary beneficiaries. The author specializes in normative legal research, which is sometimes referred to as doctrinal legal research. Field research is not recognized in normative legal research. Research that looks at laws that are produced and organized based on doctrines that have been accepted by their developers or conceptors is known as doctrinal legal research. The judge granted the plaintiff's claim in counterclaim. The Judge stated that the Defendant in the counterclaim had defaulted to the Plaintiff in the counterclaim. Due to illegal behavior and violation of the subjective rights of others that are legally protected, the defendants' actions can be qualified as unlawful acts.

KEYWORDS:

Execution, Fiduciary, and Violating the Law

REFERENCES
1) Abdul Kadir Muhammad. (2004). Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung.

2) Adhi Wicaksono. (2020). Putusan MK: Penarikan Barang Leasing Harus Melalui Pengadilan’CNN Indonesia.

3) Amiruddin, & Zainal Asikin. (2006). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

4) Fuady, M. (2005). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Pendekatan Kontemporer (2nd ed.). PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

5) J. Satrio. (2002). Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

6) Pasal 15 ayat (2) UU No. 42 Tahun 1999.

7) Pasal 15 ayat (3) UU No. 42 Tahun 1999.

8) Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019, Mahkamah Konstitusi, 6 Januari 2020.

9) Sari, I. (2020). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara–Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma, 11(1), 53–70.

10) Titin Apriani. (2019). Konsep Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Tindak Pidana. Jurnal Ganec Swara, 13(1), 43-49.

11) Y. Sogar Simamora. (2020). Prinsip Eksekutabilitas Atas Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Putusan MK.
Volume 07 Issue 10 October 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar