Aghoulid Bader

Department of English Studies, Faculty of Letters and Human Sciences, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i5-29

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study investigated the types and frequency of lexical errors made by university students of Business English in their writing and spoken production. The participants were 50 undergraduate students from a business school at the University of Ibn Zohr, Morocco. A comprehensive language assessment was conducted to measure their vocabulary size, productive vocabulary knowledge, and language proficiency. Their written essays and spoken interviews were analyzed using James' Taxonomy of Lexical Errors (1998). The results showed that the most frequent types of lexical errors made by the participants were word Distortions (46%), followed by Misformation (33%), and finally Confusion of Sense Relation (18%). The study also found a significant correlation between vocabulary size and productive vocabulary knowledge with the number and types of lexical errors made by the participants. The findings have implications for language teaching and learning, suggesting that more attention should be given to vocabulary instruction and practice to reduce lexical errors in Business English communication.

KEYWORDS:

Lexical Errors, James Taxonomy, Business English, Written and Spoken productions

REFERENCES

1) Albassri, I. A. (2016). Needs-analysis-informed teaching for English for Specific Purposes.

2) Bada, E. (2001). Native language influence on the production of English sounds by Japanese learners.

3) Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer‐assisted language learning. The modern language journal, 93, 741-753

4) Chuang, F. Y., & Nesi, H. (2006). An analysis of formal errors in a corpus of L2 English produced by Chinese students. Corpora, 1(2), 251-271.

5) Coxhead, A. (2012). Vocabulary and ESP. The Handbook of English for specific purposes, 115-132.

6) Faruk, S. M. G. (2013). English language teaching in Saudi Arabia-a world system perspective. Buletinul Stiintific al Universitatii Politehnica din Timisoara, Seria Limbi Moderne, (12), 73-80

7) Harrington, M. (2006). The lexical decision task as a measure of L2 lexical proficiency. EUROSLA yearbook, 6(1), 147- 168.

8) James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Harlow: Longman.

9) Kang, M. (2014). An Analysis of Lexical Errors of Korean Language Learners: Some American College Learners' Case. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 93-110.

10) Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking. Second language task complexity.

11) Lennon, P. (1991). Error: Some problems of definition, identification, and distinction. Applied linguistics, 12(2), 180-196.

12) Li, J. (2014). Needs Analysis: An Effective Way in Business English Curriculum Design. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 4(9).

13) Llach, M. P. A. (2007). Lexical errors as writing quality predictors. Studia linguistica, 61(1), 1-19.

14) Llach, M. D. P. A. (2011). Lexical errors and accuracy in foreign language writing (Vol. 58). Multilingual Matters.

15) Magdy, M., Shaalan, K., & Fahmy, A. (2007, December). Lexical error diagnosis for second language learners of Arabic. In Proceedings of The Seventh Conference on Language Engineering, Egyptian Society of Language Engineering (ELSE) (pp. 5-6).

16) Mahmoud, A. (2005). Collocation errors made by Arab learners of English. Asian EFL journal, 5(2), 117-126.

17) McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2006). Explorations in corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

18) Nickerson, C., & Planken, B. (2015). Introducing Business English. Routledge

19) Pérez, M. C., & Basse, R. (2015). Analysing errors of CLIL and non-CLIL primary school students in their written and oral productions: a comparative study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 11-17.

20) Pluck, G. (2018). Lexical reading ability predicts academic achievement at university level. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 22(3), 175-196.

21) Rao, P. S. (2019). The role of English as a global language. Research Journal of English, 4(1), 65-79.

22) Ridha, N. (2012). The effect of EFL learners' mother tongue on their writings in English: An error analysis study. Journal of the College of Arts, 60, 22-45.

23) Selinker, L., & Gass, S. M. (2008). Second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlhaum Ass.

24) Shalaby, N. A., Yahya, N., & El-Komi, M. (2009). Analysis of lexical errors in Saudi college students’ compositions. Journal of the Saudi Association of Languages and Translation, 2(3), 65-93.

25) St John, M. J. (1996). Business is booming: Business English in the 1990s. English for specific purposes, 15(1), 3-18.

26) Troufanova, N., & Inozemtzeva, K. (2015). Issues on business vocabulary acquisition by Russian tertiary ESP students. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(6 S5), 242.

27) Yang, X. (2019). A review of negative language transfer regarding the errors in English writing in Chinese colleges. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 603-609.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 05 MAY 2023