¹Ignasius Kayus Duan, ²IMarietta. D. Susilawati

¹Student of Master of Law Study Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
²Lecturer of Faculty Of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i11-30

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Indonesia and China still recognize the death penalty in their positive laws. One of the death penalties that can be applied to convicted criminals is corruption. Corruption is an extraordinary crime that certainly harms the state and the wider community. The problem taken here is how to identify and analyze the death penalty for corruption and its application in Indonesia and China? This research uses normative legal research as well as a comparative study. The result of this research is that there are similarities and differences between the regulation and application of the death penalty in Indonesia and China. The fundamental difference is that the death penalty in China is regulated in the Criminal Code while the death penalty in Indonesia is specifically regulated in the law.

KEYWORDS:

Comparative Study, Death Penalty, Corruption.

REFERENCES
1) Abd. Ghofur, 2017,“Kontroversi Hukuman Mati Analisis Wacana Sastra Kritis The Life Of David Gale Film Perspektif Sociocultural Practice Norman Fairclough”, Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, Vol. 1

2) Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung

3) Barda Nawawi Arief,2007, “Masalah Pidana Mati dalam Perspektif Global dan Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 4 No. 4

4) Soedjono, 1974, Hukum Dan Pembangunan Hukum Pidana, Tarsito, Bandung

5) J.E. Saahetapy, 1982, Suatu Situasi Khusus Mengenai Ancaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana, CV Rajawali

6) John Glissen dan Frits Gorle,2005 Sejarah Hukum, Refika Aditama

7) Jonathan Sarwono, 2006,Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif, Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta

8) Mardjono Reksodiputro, 2010, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia : Melihat kepada Kejahatan dan Penegakan Hukum dalam Batas-Batas Toleransi, Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta

9) Moh. Mahfud MD,2010, Membangun Politik Hukum, Menegakkan Konstitusi,Rajawali Pers, Jakarta

10) Peter Mahmud Marzuki,2015, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, PT Kharisma Putra utama, Bandung

11) Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, 2014, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta

12) R. Sughandi, 1980, KUHP Dan Penjelasannya, Usaha Nasional, Surabaya

13) Rasyid Khairani, 1977, Suatu Tinjauan Masalah Pidana Mati dalam Negara Pancasila, Baladika, Jakarta

14) Romli Atmasasmita, 1996, Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Criminal Justice System) Perspektif Eksistensialisme Dan Abolisionalisme, Penerbit Bina Cipta, Jakarta

15) Robby Septiawan Permana Putra,2016, “Problem Konstitusional Eksistensi Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati Di Indonesia”, Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 5, No. 3

16) Todung Mulya Lubis dan Alexander Lay, 2007, Kontroversi Hukuman Mati: Perbedaan Pendapat Hakim Konstitusi, Gramedia, Jakarta

17) Wirjono Prodjodikoro, 1960,Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung

18) Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Eresco, Bandung, 1986

19) Dede Kania, 2014, “Cita Politik Hukum Pidana Mati Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 4 No. 2

20) Bin Liang, Hong Lu, Terance Miethe, Lening Zhang, 2006, "Sources of Variation in Pro-Death Penalty Attitudes in China: An Exploratory Study of Chinese Students at Home and Abroad". The British Journal of Criminology

21) Efryan R. T. Jacob, 2017, “Pelaksanaan Pidana Mati Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 2/PNPS/1964”, Lex Crimen Vol. VI/No. 1

22) Lucky Nurhadiyanto,2018, “Replacement Discourse Daftar Tunggu Terpidana Mati (Death Row) dalam Perspektif Penologi Konstitutif di Indonesia”, Jurnal Kriminologi, Universitas Budi Luhur, Volume 2, Nomor 2 Desember

23) Muhammad Hatta,2012, “Perdebatan Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Islam Dengan Hukum Pidana Indonesia”, Jurnal Miqot, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh, Vol. Xxxvi No. 2

24) Shanhe Jiang, Eric G Lambert, Jin Wang, 2007 "Capital Punishment Views in China and the United States: A Preliminary Study Among College Students". International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

25) BBC News 2005, "China to review death sentences"

26) "Belajar soal Hukuman Mati Koruptor dari China", https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20211208183506-113-731640/belajar-soal-hukuman-mati-koruptor-dari-china

27) "China Hukum Mati Eks Menteri Kehakiman Gegara Kasus Korupsi", 2022, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/internasional/20220922135715-113-851277/ china-hukum-mati-eks-menteri-kehakiman-gegara-kasus-korupsi

28) CNN Indonesia, "Survei Kumham : 80 Persen Setuju Hukuman Mati, Kecuali untuk Teroris", https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20220524144628-12-800574/ Survei-kumham-80-persen-setuju-hukuman-mati-kecuali-untuk-teroris

29) Detikedu, "Apa Itu Bias? Begini Pengertian, Jenis, dan Dampaknya", https://www.detik.com/edu/detikpedia/d-6423033/apa-itu-bias-begini-pengertian-jenis-dan-dampaknya

30) "Ferdy Sambo Divonis Hukuman Mati", https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2023/02/13/15204921/ferdy-sambo-divonis-hukuman-mati

31) Hukuman mati di Tiongkok, https://p2k.stekom.ac.id/ensiklopedia/
Hukuman_mati_di_Tiongkok#:~:text=Sesuai%20dengan%20hukum%20pidana%20RRC,
tahun%20bersamaan%20dengan%20hukuman%20mati.

32) Vidya Prahassacitt, “Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Penelitian Hukum Yuridis”, 2019, https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2019/08/25/penelitian-hukum-normatif-dan-penelitian-hukum-yurudis/

33) Theresia Anita Christiani & Aprillina Mathilda Lako, (2023) Law Number 4 of 2023 in the Perspective of Values in Law, International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM) , Volume 5, Issue 7 July 2023, pp: 743-748 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252.

Volume 06 Issue 11 November 2023