VOlUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023
1,2Nayera Mohammed Hassan Ali
1Department of English, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia
2Department of English, Minia University, Egypt
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-01Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This paper aims to handle the conceptual framework within which critics present home. It helps us think about our relationship with home and examine questions about the problem of displacement directing research to Third World. This overview provides the vocabulary for articulating this dilemma. Regarding methodology, the paper is an in-depth qualitative study based on views of selected critics. The findings have indicated that applying the critics' reflections on the conditions of people is advocated to detect whether homing is attainable or still remains a desire aspired to. Hence, the paper, as a preliminary study, stimulates for further research.
KEYWORDS:attachment, concept, displacement, home, identity, space
REFERENCES
1) Duncan, J., Lambert, D. (2004). Landscapes of home. In James S. Duncan, Nuala C. Johnson, Richard H. Schein (Ed.), A
companion to cultural geography, (pp.382-403).
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470996515.ch25
2) George, R.M. (1999). The Politics of Home: Postcolonial Relocations and Twentieth Century Fiction. Berkeley and Los
Angeles: University of California Press
3) Gurr, A. (1981). Writers in Exile: The Identity of Home in Modern Literature. The Harvester Press.
4) Hooks, B. (1989). Choosing the Margin as a Space of Radical Openness. Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 36
(15-23). http://www.jstor.org/stable/44111660
5) Porteous, D. (1976). Home: the territorial core. Geographical Review 66 (4) (pp.383- 390). https://doi.org/10.2307/213649
6) Pratt, M. B. (1984). Homesick with nowhere to go. In Minnie Bruce Pratt, Elly Bulking and Barbara Smith (Ed.), Yours in
struggle: Three feminist perspectives on anti- Semitism and racism. New York: Long Haul Press (pp. 11-63).
7) Rose, G. (1993). Feminism and Geography: The Limits of Geographical Knowledge. London: Blackwell, Polity.
8) Said, E. (1983). The World, The Text and The Critic. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
9) Sopher, D. E. (1979). The Landscape of Home: Myth, Experience, Social Meaning. In D. W. Meinig (Ed.), The
Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes. New York: Oxford University (pp.129-152).
10) Terkenli, T. S. (1995). Home as a Region. Geographical Review, 85 (3), 324 - 334. https://doi.org/10.2307/215276
11) Tuan, Y- Fu. (1974). Topophilia: A Study of Environment, Perception, Attitudes and Values. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
12) Vidler, A. (1992). The Architectural Uncanny: Essays on the Modern Unhomely. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.