Anwar

Tarbiyah Faculty, Parepare State Islamic Institute

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i9-31

Google Scholar Download Pdf
Abstract

This study empirically examines the family as the basis of social capital education. Furthermore, generations need social capital to grow and develop as moderate, tolerant, and caring characters towards humanist environmental issues. The main and fundamental task of the family is to conduct educational function, which is inherently social and religious in preparing generations. Therefore, it is necessary to have the right effort or approach to actualizing social capital for effectiveness. This helps develop a religious climate and form a pattern of behavior for each family member. Religion is used as an instrument that facilitates the internalization of social capital values in children and shapes their personality with a humanist character. Therefore, families significantly counteract radicalism in social life.

KEYWORDS:

Social Capital, Religious Basis, Radicalism, Family.

REFERENCES

1) Atosokhi Gea, Antonius, (2005). Character Building II Relasi dengan Sesama, Jakarta: PT. Gramedia, Cetakan pertama.

2) Abu Hamid, (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial, Suatu Stretegi, Teknik dan Taktik Wawancara, Jilid I dan II, PPS Universitas Hasanuddin.

3) Abu Hamid, (2005). Potensi Modal Sosial (Social Capital) dalam Pemberdayaan Budaya, Majallah Citrabuana, No. 7 Sepetember 2005.

4) Ahmad, Haidlor Ali, et.al. (2011). Harmoni: Jurnal Multikultural dan Multireligius, ISSN 1412-663-X, Nomor Akreditasi: 268/AUI/ P2MBI/ 05//2010. 9 (2)/262.

5) Ahmad, Haidlor Ali, et.al. (2011). Harmoni: Jurnal Multikultural dan Multireligius, ISSN 1412-663-X, Nomor Akreditasi: 268/AUI/ P2MBI/ 05//2010. 9 (3)/250.

6) Azra, Azyumardi. Merajut Kerukunan Hidup Beragama antar Cita dan Fakta. Harmoni. Vol.11. no. 7 ( Juli-September 2003). 8-26.

7) Definition/Social-Capital. (2021). Definition of Social Capital by Oxford Dictionary on Lexico.com also meaning of Social Capital". Lexico Dictionaries English. https://ww.lexico.com/en/ (Retrieved 17 January 2021).

8) E. Merril, Francis, (1965). Society and Culture: An Introduction to Sociology,Third Edition, United States America, Prentince-Hall.

9) Faiqah, Nurul, at.al, (2018).“Radikalisme Islam vs Moderasi Islam: Upaya Membangun Wajah Islam Indonesia yang Damai,” Al-Fikra: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 17 (1)/33-60.

10) FauziIman, Ghifari, (2017). “Radikalisme di Internet”, Religious: Jurnal Agama dan Lintas Budaya.1 (2)/123-134

11) Francis, Fukuyama, (1999). Social Capital and Civil Society, Institute of Public Policy-George Mason University.

12) Francis, Fukuyama, (2001). Social Capital-Civil Society-and Development, third World Quarterly.

13) Hauberer, Julia. (2011). Introducing the Civic Perspective on Social Capital-Robert D. Putnam’s Concept of Social Capital. Spinger Link Journal. 2011. p. 53-86

14) Hasbullah, Jousairi, (2006). Social Capital: Menuju Keunggulan Budaya Manusia Indonesia, Jakarta: MR-United Press, Cetakan pertama.

15) Yunus, A Faiz, (2017). “Liberalisme dan Terorisme: Pengaruhnya terhadap Agama Islam”, Jurnal Studi Al-Quran Membangun Tradisi Berfikir Qur’ani P-ISSN: 0126-1648, E-ISSN: 2239-2614. 13 (1). 76-94. doi.org/10.21009/JSQ.013.1.06.

16) Yusuf, Choirul Fuad, (2016). Religious Conflict a Mapping of Conflict in Indonesian Regions 1997-2005. Center for Research and Development of Religious Literature an Heritage Agency for Research, Development, and Training Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta.

17) Lin, Nan, (2012). Social Capital A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.

18) Miles, M. B dan Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis, Baverly Hills, California: Sage Publication.

19) Nurkhalish A, Ghaffar, (2016). Religious Manuscripts Buginese, Balinese and Sundanese Edition, Center for Research and Development of Religious Literature an Heritage Agency for Research, Development, and Training Ministry of Religious Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. Jakarta.

20) Poloma, Margaret M, (2007). Sosiologi Kontemporer, Jakarta: PT. Radja Grafindo Persada, Cetakanpertama.

21) Pretty, Jules and Hugh Ward, (1999). Social Capital and the Environment, Paper Submitted to World Bank.

22) Rogosic, Silvia, and Baranovic, Brasmilava. (2016). Social Capital and Educational Achievements: Colmen Vs. Bourdieu. C.E.P.S. Journal. Vol. 6 (2)/ Year 2016/ p.81-94.

23) Riyadi, Hendar, (2016) “Koeksistensi damai dalam Masyarakat Muslim Modernis”, Wawasan: Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya 1, 1 (18), Doi: 10.15575/jw.v39i1.575

24) Rivai, (2007). Modal Sosial Masyarakat Bugis di Perkampungan Nelayan Anetue-Kaca Kabupaten Soppeng, Desertasi, UNHAS.

25) Rosyada, Dede. (2007). Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis sebuah Model Pelibatan Masyarakat dalam Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, Cetakan ketiga.

26) Suhaeb, Firdaus W. (2008). ”Pentingnya Modal Sosial dalam Membangun Civil Society”,Predestinasi Jurnal Penelitian, Gagasan, Sosiolologi, dan Pengajaran, Jurusan Sosiologi UNM.

27) Sugiyono, (1997). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Alfabeta. Cetakan Keempat.

28) Salam, Sofyan. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Pengujian Keabsahan Data, Makassar.

29) Strauss A dan Corbin, J. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif Tata Langkah dan Teknik Teoritisasi Data, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Fajar.

30) Taylor, Shelly E, et al, (2009). Social Psycology, terjemahan ” Psikologi Sosial Edisi ke 12, Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Offset, Cetakan pertama.

31) Woolcock, M. (1998) “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework”. Theory and Society. 27(2): 151−208.

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 09 SEPTEMBER 2021